Ahrefs vs ChartMogul

Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and ChartMogul (Subscription Analytics Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Ahrefs and ChartMogul sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (41), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ChartMogul is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of ChartMogul. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ChartMogul is ahead of Ahrefs. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of ChartMogul. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of ChartMogul.

Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. ChartMogul shows 112 stars across 21 public repos, 7 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Ahrefs's footprint is roughly 11.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. ChartMogul looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.