Ahrefs vs Codecademy

Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Codecademy (The easiest way to learn to code.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Codecademy (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 37). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Codecademy. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is ahead of Codecademy. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Codecademy. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Codecademy is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Codecademy.

Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Codecademy shows 5,241 stars across 86 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Codecademy's footprint is roughly 4.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Codecademy looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.