Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Ahrefs vs Cybersource

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Cybersource both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Cybersource (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 36). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cybersource is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Cybersource. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Cybersource is ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Cybersource.

Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Cybersource shows 587 stars across 40 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors.

Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Cybersource looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAhrefsCybersource
Ranking
Overall rank#401#536
Pillars
Overall4136
Code4249
Education5764
Community3731
Reach2136
Momentum6537
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars1,303587
Forks261986
Public repos17140
Active repos (90d)2828
External contributors77
Avg polish4048
Avg AI-readiness3543

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Ahrefs developer profileView Cybersource developer profile