BTW we use OCaml
Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.
Ahrefs vs Doctolib
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Doctolib (Our mission is to build together the healthcare we all dream of. Learn more about our engineering team on our career page.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Doctolib (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 33). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Doctolib is ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Doctolib is ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is ahead of Doctolib. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Ahrefs is ahead of Doctolib. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Doctolib.
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Doctolib shows 776 stars across 57 public repos, 10 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Doctolib looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | Doctolib |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 33 |
| Code | 42 | 51 |
| Education | 57 | 72 |
| Community | 37 | 28 |
| Reach | 21 | 10 |
| Momentum | 65 | 19 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 776 |
| Forks | 261 | 81 |
| Public repos | 171 | 57 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 10 |
| External contributors | 7 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 50 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 31 |