BTW we use OCaml
Ahrefs vs Help Scout
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Help Scout (The all-in-one platform for delightful conversations) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Help Scout (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 35). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Help Scout is ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Help Scout is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is ahead of Help Scout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Help Scout. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Help Scout.
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Help Scout shows 663 stars across 175 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Help Scout looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | Help Scout |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 35 |
| Code | 42 | 57 |
| Education | 57 | 64 |
| Community | 37 | 28 |
| Reach | 21 | 0 |
| Momentum | 65 | 8 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 663 |
| Forks | 261 | 222 |
| Public repos | 171 | 175 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 4 |
| External contributors | 7 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 51 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 42 |