BTW we use OCaml
Ahrefs vs jotform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and jotform (Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a modest lead over jotform (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 30). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), jotform is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is ahead of jotform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is ahead of jotform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), jotform is ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of jotform.
Ahrefs carries 1,305 GitHub stars across 173 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors on record. jotform shows 1,105 stars across 32 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. jotform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | jotform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #727 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 30 |
| Code | 42 | 43 |
| Education | 57 | 43 |
| Community | 37 | 20 |
| Reach | 21 | 41 |
| Momentum | 65 | 36 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,305 | 1,105 |
| Forks | 260 | 412 |
| Public repos | 173 | 32 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 4 |
| External contributors | 6 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 29 |