Ahrefs vs Lansweeper NV

Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 30). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Lansweeper NV is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Lansweeper NV is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV.

Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lansweeper NV looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.