Ahrefs vs mParticle by Rokt

Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and mParticle by Rokt both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

mParticle by Rokt (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Ahrefs (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 41). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), mParticle by Rokt is ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), mParticle by Rokt is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of mParticle by Rokt.

Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. mParticle by Rokt shows 317 stars across 85 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Ahrefs's footprint is roughly 4.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. mParticle by Rokt looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.