BTW we use OCaml
Ahrefs vs Odoo
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Odoo (Open Source Business Apps) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a narrow lead over Odoo (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 38). The gap of 3 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Odoo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Odoo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Odoo is ahead of Ahrefs. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Odoo is ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Odoo.
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Odoo shows 59,467 stars across 43 public repos, 25 active in the last 90 days and 257 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Odoo's footprint is roughly 45.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Odoo looks better where community is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | Odoo |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 38 |
| Code | 42 | 41 |
| Education | 57 | 52 |
| Community | 37 | 54 |
| Reach | 21 | 30 |
| Momentum | 65 | 36 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 59,467 |
| Forks | 261 | 52,908 |
| Public repos | 171 | 43 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 25 |
| External contributors | 7 | 257 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 45 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 22 |