Ahrefs vs PostHog

Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and PostHog (The single platform to analyze, test, observe, and deploy new features) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

PostHog (rank #30) holds a meaningful lead over Ahrefs (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 41). The gap of 22 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), PostHog is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), PostHog is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), PostHog is ahead of Ahrefs. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), PostHog is ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), PostHog is ahead of Ahrefs.

Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. PostHog shows 40,775 stars across 357 public repos, 87 active in the last 90 days and 212 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but PostHog's footprint is roughly 31.3x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Ahrefs is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. PostHog looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.