Ahrefs vs Razorpay

Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Razorpay (rank #31) holds a meaningful lead over Ahrefs (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 41). The gap of 22 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Razorpay. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Ahrefs.

Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,812 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 33 external contributors.

Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Razorpay looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.