BTW we use OCaml
Ahrefs vs Sumo Logic, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Sumo Logic, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Ahrefs and Sumo Logic, Inc. sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (41), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Sumo Logic, Inc. is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Sumo Logic, Inc. is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Sumo Logic, Inc. is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Sumo Logic, Inc..
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Sumo Logic, Inc. shows 1,842 stars across 107 public repos, 27 active in the last 90 days and 14 external contributors.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Sumo Logic, Inc. looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | Sumo Logic, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #401 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 41 |
| Code | 42 | 50 |
| Education | 57 | 47 |
| Community | 37 | 42 |
| Reach | 21 | 23 |
| Momentum | 65 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 1,842 |
| Forks | 261 | 1,655 |
| Public repos | 171 | 107 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 27 |
| External contributors | 7 | 14 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 39 |