BTW we use OCaml
Making sales tax filing easier for more than 20,000 online sellers and merchants across the world.
Ahrefs vs TaxJar
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and TaxJar (Making sales tax filing easier for more than 20,000 online sellers and merchants across the world.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a modest lead over TaxJar (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 31). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), TaxJar is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), TaxJar is ahead of Ahrefs. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is ahead of TaxJar. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Ahrefs is ahead of TaxJar. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of TaxJar.
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. TaxJar shows 490 stars across 39 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. TaxJar looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | TaxJar |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 31 |
| Code | 42 | 63 |
| Education | 57 | 71 |
| Community | 37 | 18 |
| Reach | 21 | 1 |
| Momentum | 65 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 490 |
| Forks | 261 | 279 |
| Public repos | 171 | 39 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 1 |
| External contributors | 7 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 61 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 41 |