BTW we use OCaml
World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!
Ahrefs vs Teamwork.com
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Teamwork.com (World-class products that work together to streamline your business. We're hiring!) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Teamwork.com (rank #237) holds a narrow lead over Ahrefs (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (48 vs 41). The gap of 7 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Teamwork.com is ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Teamwork.com is slightly ahead of Ahrefs. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Teamwork.com is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Teamwork.com.
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Teamwork.com shows 2,108 stars across 123 public repos, 14 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Teamwork.com looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | Teamwork.com |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #237 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 48 |
| Code | 42 | 58 |
| Education | 57 | 59 |
| Community | 37 | 37 |
| Reach | 21 | 47 |
| Momentum | 65 | 27 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 2,108 |
| Forks | 261 | 384 |
| Public repos | 171 | 123 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 14 |
| External contributors | 7 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 62 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 38 |