Ahrefs vs Typeform

Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Typeform both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Typeform (rank #189) holds a modest lead over Ahrefs (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (50 vs 41). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Typeform is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Typeform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is ahead of Typeform. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Typeform is clearly ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Typeform.

Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Typeform shows 590 stars across 40 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Typeform looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.