Ahrefs vs Wealthsimple

Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Wealthsimple (Building the world's most human financial company) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Wealthsimple (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 31). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Wealthsimple is ahead of Ahrefs. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Wealthsimple. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is clearly ahead of Wealthsimple. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Wealthsimple is ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Ahrefs is ahead of Wealthsimple.

Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Wealthsimple shows 138 stars across 102 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Ahrefs's footprint is roughly 9.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Wealthsimple looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.