BTW we use OCaml
Unique and powerful suite of software to run your entire business, brought to you by a company with the long term vision to transform the way you work.
Ahrefs vs Zoho
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Ahrefs (BTW we use OCaml) and Zoho (Unique and powerful suite of software to run your entire business, brought to you by a company with the long term vision to transform the way you work.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Ahrefs (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Zoho (rank #662) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 32). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Zoho. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Ahrefs is ahead of Zoho. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Ahrefs is slightly ahead of Zoho. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Zoho is ahead of Ahrefs. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Zoho is ahead of Ahrefs.
Ahrefs carries 1,303 GitHub stars across 171 public repos, with 28 repositories active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors on record. Zoho shows 756 stars across 244 public repos, 55 active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors.
Ahrefs is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Zoho looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Ahrefs | Zoho |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #662 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 32 |
| Code | 42 | 37 |
| Education | 57 | 43 |
| Community | 37 | 31 |
| Reach | 21 | 37 |
| Momentum | 65 | 76 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,303 | 756 |
| Forks | 261 | 540 |
| Public repos | 171 | 244 |
| Active repos (90d) | 28 | 55 |
| External contributors | 7 | 1 |
| Avg polish | 40 | 40 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 35 | 27 |