Airbase vs Lansweeper NV
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Airbase and Lansweeper NV (All development of lansweeper) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Airbase (rank #401) holds a modest lead over Lansweeper NV (rank #728) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (41 vs 30). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Airbase is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Airbase is ahead of Lansweeper NV. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Airbase is clearly ahead of Lansweeper NV. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Lansweeper NV is ahead of Airbase.
Airbase carries 7 GitHub stars across 76 public repos, with 4 repositories active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors on record. Lansweeper NV shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Airbase is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Lansweeper NV looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Airbase | Lansweeper NV |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #401 | #728 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 41 | 30 |
| Code | 35 | 0 |
| Education | 72 | 60 |
| Community | 28 | 0 |
| Reach | 50 | 50 |
| Momentum | 8 | 28 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 7 | 0 |
| Forks | 7 | 0 |
| Public repos | 76 | 0 |
| Active repos (90d) | 4 | 0 |
| External contributors | 2 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 30 | 0 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 37 | 0 |