Airtable is a modern database created for everyone
Airtable vs Culture Amp
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Airtable (Airtable is a modern database created for everyone) and Culture Amp (The employee feedback platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Airtable (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Culture Amp (rank #693) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 31). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Airtable. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Airtable is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Culture Amp is slightly ahead of Airtable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Airtable is clearly ahead of Culture Amp. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Culture Amp is clearly ahead of Airtable.
Airtable carries 3,237 GitHub stars across 35 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Culture Amp shows 1,202 stars across 179 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 18 external contributors.
Airtable is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Culture Amp looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Airtable | Culture Amp |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #165 | #693 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 51 | 31 |
| Code | 45 | 53 |
| Education | 72 | 49 |
| Community | 23 | 24 |
| Reach | 61 | 20 |
| Momentum | 6 | 31 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,237 | 1,202 |
| Forks | 843 | 123 |
| Public repos | 35 | 179 |
| Active repos (90d) | 3 | 17 |
| External contributors | 1 | 18 |
| Avg polish | 43 | 51 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 26 | 38 |