Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Airtable vs Jamf

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Airtable (Airtable is a modern database created for everyone) and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Airtable (rank #165) holds a modest lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (51 vs 40). The gap of 11 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Airtable is ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Airtable is slightly ahead of Jamf. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Jamf is ahead of Airtable. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Airtable is ahead of Jamf. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Jamf is clearly ahead of Airtable.

Airtable carries 3,237 GitHub stars across 35 public repos, with 3 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Airtable is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Jamf looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAirtableJamf
Ranking
Overall rank#165#430
Pillars
Overall5140
Code4533
Education7268
Community2341
Reach6144
Momentum661
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars3,2377,946
Forks8431,547
Public repos35114
Active repos (90d)320
External contributors15
Avg polish4345
Avg AI-readiness2621

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Airtable developer profileView Jamf developer profile