Akeneo vs Asana
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Akeneo and Asana both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Akeneo and Asana sit at essentially the same overall ecosystem score (43), which is unusual and worth reading through the pillars below.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is ahead of Asana. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Asana is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Akeneo is slightly ahead of Asana. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Asana is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Akeneo is clearly ahead of Asana.
Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Asana shows 1,843 stars across 34 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Asana looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Akeneo | Asana |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #338 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 43 |
| Code | 62 | 49 |
| Education | 47 | 70 |
| Community | 37 | 29 |
| Reach | 10 | 38 |
| Momentum | 42 | 16 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,126 | 1,843 |
| Forks | 1,327 | 598 |
| Public repos | 51 | 34 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 8 |
| External contributors | 15 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 44 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 43 |