Akeneo vs BookStackApp

Akeneo and BookStackApp both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Akeneo (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over BookStackApp (rank #401) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 41). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is ahead of BookStackApp. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), BookStackApp is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), BookStackApp is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), BookStackApp is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), BookStackApp is clearly ahead of Akeneo.

Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. BookStackApp shows 19,167 stars across 6 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but BookStackApp's footprint is roughly 9.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. BookStackApp looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.