Akeneo vs Clio

Akeneo and Clio both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Akeneo (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Clio (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is ahead of Clio. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Akeneo is ahead of Clio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Akeneo is ahead of Clio.

Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Clio shows 518 stars across 19 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Akeneo's footprint is roughly 4.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Clio looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.