Akeneo vs Cloudbeds

Akeneo and Cloudbeds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Akeneo (rank #318) holds a modest lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 30). The gap of 14 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Akeneo is slightly ahead of Cloudbeds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Akeneo is ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Akeneo is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds.

Akeneo carries 2,130 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 9 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Cloudbeds shows 49 stars across 29 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Akeneo's footprint is roughly 43.5x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Cloudbeds looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.