Akeneo vs Fillout

Akeneo and Fillout both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Akeneo (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Fillout (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 37). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is clearly ahead of Fillout. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Fillout is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Akeneo is ahead of Fillout. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Fillout is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Akeneo is clearly ahead of Fillout.

Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Fillout shows 2 stars across 9 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Akeneo's footprint is roughly 1063.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Fillout looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.