Akeneo vs Increase
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Akeneo and Increase (Build your bank) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Increase (rank #55) holds a modest lead over Akeneo (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (60 vs 43). The gap of 17 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is ahead of Increase. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Increase is ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Increase is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Increase is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Increase is slightly ahead of Akeneo.
Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Increase shows 45 stars across 12 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Akeneo's footprint is roughly 47.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Increase looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Akeneo | Increase |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #55 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 60 |
| Code | 62 | 52 |
| Education | 47 | 59 |
| Community | 37 | 68 |
| Reach | 10 | 79 |
| Momentum | 42 | 43 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,126 | 45 |
| Forks | 1,327 | 15 |
| Public repos | 51 | 12 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 11 |
| External contributors | 15 | 5 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 47 |