Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Akeneo vs Miro

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Akeneo and Miro (Visual workspace for innovation) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Akeneo (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over Miro (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 38). The gap of 5 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is slightly ahead of Miro. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Miro is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Akeneo is slightly ahead of Miro. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Akeneo is ahead of Miro. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Akeneo is clearly ahead of Miro.

Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Miro shows 843 stars across 45 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 6 external contributors.

Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Miro looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAkeneoMiro
Ranking
Overall rank#338#485
Pillars
Overall4338
Code6258
Education4786
Community3732
Reach100
Momentum428
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars2,126843
Forks1,327380
Public repos5145
Active repos (90d)74
External contributors156
Avg polish5965
Avg AI-readiness3932

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Akeneo developer profileView Miro developer profile