Akeneo vs Razorpay
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Akeneo and Razorpay both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Razorpay (rank #30) holds a modest lead over Akeneo (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 43). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Razorpay is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Razorpay is clearly ahead of Akeneo.
Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Razorpay shows 3,811 stars across 177 public repos, 38 active in the last 90 days and 32 external contributors.
Akeneo is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Razorpay looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Akeneo | Razorpay |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #30 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 63 |
| Code | 62 | 68 |
| Education | 47 | 53 |
| Community | 37 | 44 |
| Reach | 10 | 58 |
| Momentum | 42 | 71 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,126 | 3,811 |
| Forks | 1,327 | 1,932 |
| Public repos | 51 | 177 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 38 |
| External contributors | 15 | 32 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 69 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 49 |