Akeneo vs ReadMe

Akeneo and ReadMe (Interactive developer hubs that help users succeed with your APIs 🦉) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

ReadMe (rank #257) holds a narrow lead over Akeneo (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (47 vs 43). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), ReadMe is ahead of Akeneo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), ReadMe is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), ReadMe is ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), ReadMe is slightly ahead of Akeneo.

Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. ReadMe shows 1,824 stars across 106 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 21 external contributors.

Akeneo is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. ReadMe looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.