Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Akeneo vs Recurly

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Akeneo and Recurly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Recurly (rank #317) holds a narrow lead over Akeneo (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 43). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Recurly is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Recurly is ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Akeneo is slightly ahead of Recurly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Akeneo is slightly ahead of Recurly. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Recurly is clearly ahead of Akeneo.

Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Recurly shows 1,564 stars across 53 public repos, 26 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Recurly looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAkeneoRecurly
Ranking
Overall rank#338#317
Pillars
Overall4344
Code6268
Education4757
Community3734
Reach107
Momentum4264
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars2,1261,564
Forks1,327700
Public repos5153
Active repos (90d)726
External contributors155
Avg polish5970
Avg AI-readiness3937

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Akeneo developer profileView Recurly developer profile