Akeneo vs RingCentral, Inc.
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Akeneo and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Akeneo (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 42). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Akeneo is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. .
Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.
Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Akeneo | RingCentral, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 42 |
| Code | 62 | 59 |
| Education | 47 | 52 |
| Community | 37 | 42 |
| Reach | 10 | 23 |
| Momentum | 42 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,126 | 1,659 |
| Forks | 1,327 | 23,722 |
| Public repos | 51 | 184 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 31 |
| External contributors | 15 | 17 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 57 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 48 |