Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Akeneo vs RingCentral, Inc.

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Akeneo and RingCentral, Inc. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Akeneo (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over RingCentral, Inc. (rank #372) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 42). The gap of 1 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. . On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), RingCentral, Inc. is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), RingCentral, Inc. is ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Akeneo is slightly ahead of RingCentral, Inc. .

Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. RingCentral, Inc. shows 1,659 stars across 184 public repos, 31 active in the last 90 days and 17 external contributors.

Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. RingCentral, Inc. looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAkeneoRingCentral, Inc.
Ranking
Overall rank#338#372
Pillars
Overall4342
Code6259
Education4752
Community3742
Reach1023
Momentum4239
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars2,1261,659
Forks1,32723,722
Public repos51184
Active repos (90d)731
External contributors1517
Avg polish5957
Avg AI-readiness3948

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Akeneo developer profileView RingCentral, Inc. developer profile