Akeneo vs Skyscanner

Akeneo and Skyscanner both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Skyscanner (rank #209) holds a narrow lead over Akeneo (rank #338) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (49 vs 43). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Skyscanner is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Skyscanner is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Akeneo is slightly ahead of Skyscanner.

Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Skyscanner shows 8,167 stars across 86 public repos, 18 active in the last 90 days and 39 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Skyscanner's footprint is roughly 3.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Skyscanner looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.