Akeneo vs Starling Bank
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Akeneo and Starling Bank both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Akeneo (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Starling Bank (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 33). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is ahead of Starling Bank. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Akeneo is clearly ahead of Starling Bank. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Starling Bank is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Starling Bank is slightly ahead of Akeneo.
Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. Starling Bank shows 195 stars across 3 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Akeneo's footprint is roughly 10.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Starling Bank looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Akeneo | Starling Bank |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #625 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 33 |
| Code | 62 | 50 |
| Education | 47 | 55 |
| Community | 37 | 9 |
| Reach | 10 | 63 |
| Momentum | 42 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,126 | 195 |
| Forks | 1,327 | 29 |
| Public repos | 51 | 3 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 3 |
| External contributors | 15 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 58 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 14 |