Akeneo vs UXPin
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Akeneo and UXPin (The Full-Stack UX Design Platform) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Akeneo (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over UXPin (rank #569) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 35). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is clearly ahead of UXPin. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), UXPin is ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Akeneo is clearly ahead of UXPin. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), UXPin is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Akeneo is slightly ahead of UXPin.
Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. UXPin shows 879 stars across 25 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.
Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. UXPin looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Akeneo | UXPin |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #338 | #569 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 43 | 35 |
| Code | 62 | 30 |
| Education | 47 | 66 |
| Community | 37 | 13 |
| Reach | 10 | 39 |
| Momentum | 42 | 34 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 2,126 | 879 |
| Forks | 1,327 | 117 |
| Public repos | 51 | 25 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 3 |
| External contributors | 15 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 59 | 23 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 39 | 21 |