Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Akeneo vs The Washington Post

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Akeneo and The Washington Post both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Akeneo (rank #338) holds a narrow lead over The Washington Post (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 37). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Akeneo is ahead of The Washington Post. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), The Washington Post is slightly ahead of Akeneo. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Akeneo is ahead of The Washington Post. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), The Washington Post is clearly ahead of Akeneo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Akeneo is clearly ahead of The Washington Post.

Akeneo carries 2,126 GitHub stars across 51 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 15 external contributors on record. The Washington Post shows 2,751 stars across 91 public repos, 3 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Akeneo is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. The Washington Post looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricAkeneoThe Washington Post
Ranking
Overall rank#338#510
Pillars
Overall4337
Code6250
Education4749
Community3718
Reach1050
Momentum4218
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars2,1262,751
Forks1,3271,061
Public repos5191
Active repos (90d)73
External contributors150
Avg polish5955
Avg AI-readiness3930

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Akeneo developer profileView The Washington Post developer profile