The official global GitHub of Amadeus IT Group, hosting Open Source content. Amadeus provides the technology that keeps the travel sector moving.
Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications
Amadeus IT Group vs Countly Team
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Amadeus IT Group (The official global GitHub of Amadeus IT Group, hosting Open Source content. Amadeus provides the technology that keeps the travel sector moving.) and Countly Team (Countly is a privacy-first, AI-powered analytics and engagement platform for understanding and optimizing customer journeys across digital applications) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Amadeus IT Group (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Countly Team (rank #485) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 38). The gap of 2 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Amadeus IT Group is ahead of Countly Team. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Countly Team is ahead of Amadeus IT Group. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Countly Team is slightly ahead of Amadeus IT Group. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Countly Team is slightly ahead of Amadeus IT Group. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Amadeus IT Group is slightly ahead of Countly Team.
Amadeus IT Group carries 1,712 GitHub stars across 196 public repos, with 72 repositories active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors on record. Countly Team shows 7,804 stars across 48 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 13 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Countly Team's footprint is roughly 4.6x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Amadeus IT Group is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Countly Team looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Amadeus IT Group | Countly Team |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #485 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 38 |
| Code | 71 | 57 |
| Education | 43 | 56 |
| Community | 42 | 46 |
| Reach | 11 | 17 |
| Momentum | 64 | 61 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,712 | 7,804 |
| Forks | 543 | 2,002 |
| Public repos | 196 | 48 |
| Active repos (90d) | 72 | 20 |
| External contributors | 25 | 13 |
| Avg polish | 74 | 61 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 52 | 37 |