The official global GitHub of Amadeus IT Group, hosting Open Source content. Amadeus provides the technology that keeps the travel sector moving.
Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.
Amadeus IT Group vs Wrike
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Amadeus IT Group (The official global GitHub of Amadeus IT Group, hosting Open Source content. Amadeus provides the technology that keeps the travel sector moving.) and Wrike (Welcome to the Wrike TechClub open source community. Let's make tech world better together! NB: members must have two-factor auth.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Amadeus IT Group (rank #430) holds a narrow lead over Wrike (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (40 vs 34). The gap of 6 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Amadeus IT Group is clearly ahead of Wrike. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Wrike is clearly ahead of Amadeus IT Group. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Amadeus IT Group is clearly ahead of Wrike. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Wrike is slightly ahead of Amadeus IT Group. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Amadeus IT Group is clearly ahead of Wrike.
Amadeus IT Group carries 1,712 GitHub stars across 196 public repos, with 72 repositories active in the last 90 days and 25 external contributors on record. Wrike shows 276 stars across 33 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Amadeus IT Group's footprint is roughly 6.2x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Amadeus IT Group is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Wrike looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Amadeus IT Group | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #430 | #602 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 40 | 34 |
| Code | 71 | 49 |
| Education | 43 | 77 |
| Community | 42 | 11 |
| Reach | 11 | 15 |
| Momentum | 64 | 30 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 1,712 | 276 |
| Forks | 543 | 61 |
| Public repos | 196 | 33 |
| Active repos (90d) | 72 | 1 |
| External contributors | 25 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 74 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 52 | 30 |