Amplitude vs Clio

Amplitude and Clio both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Amplitude (rank #93) holds a meaningful lead over Clio (rank #625) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 33). The gap of 23 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Amplitude is ahead of Clio. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Clio is clearly ahead of Amplitude. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Clio. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Clio. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Clio.

Amplitude carries 3,167 GitHub stars across 151 public repos, with 39 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Clio shows 518 stars across 19 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Amplitude's footprint is roughly 6.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Amplitude is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Clio looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.