Amplitude vs Cloudbeds

Amplitude and Cloudbeds both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Amplitude (rank #94) holds a meaningful lead over Cloudbeds (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 30). The gap of 26 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cloudbeds is clearly ahead of Amplitude. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Amplitude is ahead of Cloudbeds. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Cloudbeds.

Amplitude carries 3,154 GitHub stars across 151 public repos, with 39 repositories active in the last 90 days and 20 external contributors on record. Cloudbeds shows 49 stars across 29 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Amplitude's footprint is roughly 64.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Amplitude is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Cloudbeds looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.