Amplitude vs Cybersource
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Amplitude and Cybersource both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Amplitude (rank #93) holds a modest lead over Cybersource (rank #536) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 36). The gap of 20 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Cybersource. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Cybersource is clearly ahead of Amplitude. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Amplitude is ahead of Cybersource. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Cybersource is ahead of Amplitude. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Cybersource.
Amplitude carries 3,167 GitHub stars across 151 public repos, with 39 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Cybersource shows 587 stars across 40 public repos, 28 active in the last 90 days and 7 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Amplitude's footprint is roughly 5.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Amplitude is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Cybersource looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Amplitude | Cybersource |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #536 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 36 |
| Code | 70 | 49 |
| Education | 42 | 64 |
| Community | 42 | 31 |
| Reach | 21 | 36 |
| Momentum | 72 | 37 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,167 | 587 |
| Forks | 1,052 | 986 |
| Public repos | 151 | 40 |
| Active repos (90d) | 39 | 28 |
| External contributors | 23 | 7 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 48 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 43 |