Amplitude vs Jamf

Amplitude and Jamf both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Amplitude (rank #93) holds a modest lead over Jamf (rank #430) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 40). The gap of 16 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Jamf. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Jamf is clearly ahead of Amplitude. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Amplitude is slightly ahead of Jamf. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Jamf is clearly ahead of Amplitude. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Amplitude is ahead of Jamf.

Amplitude carries 3,167 GitHub stars across 151 public repos, with 39 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Jamf shows 7,946 stars across 114 public repos, 20 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors.

Amplitude is the stronger read for anyone weighting code quality. Jamf looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.