Amplitude vs Picsart
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Amplitude and Picsart both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Amplitude (rank #93) holds a modest lead over Picsart (rank #510) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 37). The gap of 19 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Amplitude is ahead of Picsart. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Picsart is slightly ahead of Amplitude. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Amplitude is ahead of Picsart. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Picsart is ahead of Amplitude. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Picsart.
Amplitude carries 3,167 GitHub stars across 151 public repos, with 39 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Picsart shows 160 stars across 33 public repos, 6 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Amplitude's footprint is roughly 19.8x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
Amplitude is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Picsart looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Amplitude | Picsart |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #510 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 37 |
| Code | 70 | 53 |
| Education | 42 | 47 |
| Community | 42 | 25 |
| Reach | 21 | 31 |
| Momentum | 72 | 40 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,167 | 160 |
| Forks | 1,052 | 39 |
| Public repos | 151 | 33 |
| Active repos (90d) | 39 | 6 |
| External contributors | 23 | 0 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 55 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 32 |