Amplitude vs Zammad
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Amplitude and Zammad both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Amplitude (rank #93) holds a narrow lead over Zammad (rank #152) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (56 vs 52). The gap of 4 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Amplitude is slightly ahead of Zammad. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Zammad is clearly ahead of Amplitude. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Zammad is clearly ahead of Amplitude. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Zammad. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Amplitude is clearly ahead of Zammad.
Amplitude carries 3,167 GitHub stars across 151 public repos, with 39 repositories active in the last 90 days and 23 external contributors on record. Zammad shows 6,394 stars across 11 public repos, 9 active in the last 90 days and 27 external contributors.
Amplitude is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. Zammad looks better where education is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Amplitude | Zammad |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #93 | #152 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 56 | 52 |
| Code | 70 | 63 |
| Education | 42 | 71 |
| Community | 42 | 70 |
| Reach | 21 | 0 |
| Momentum | 72 | 39 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 3,167 | 6,394 |
| Forks | 1,052 | 1,687 |
| Public repos | 151 | 11 |
| Active repos (90d) | 39 | 9 |
| External contributors | 23 | 27 |
| Avg polish | 70 | 71 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 44 | 35 |