Anthropic vs deepset

Anthropic and deepset (Building enterprise search systems powered by latest NLP & open-source.) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Anthropic (rank #30) holds a modest lead over deepset (rank #122) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 54). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), deepset is ahead of Anthropic. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Anthropic is slightly ahead of deepset. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Anthropic is ahead of deepset. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), deepset is ahead of Anthropic. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Anthropic is ahead of deepset.

Anthropic carries 584,923 GitHub stars across 93 public repos, with 47 repositories active in the last 90 days and 873 external contributors on record. deepset shows 30,141 stars across 74 public repos, 17 active in the last 90 days and 171 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Anthropic's footprint is roughly 19.4x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Anthropic is the stronger read for anyone weighting momentum. deepset looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.