Anthropic vs Eli-Lilly

Anthropic and Eli-Lilly both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Anthropic (rank #30) holds a meaningful lead over Eli-Lilly (rank #1095) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (63 vs 10). The gap of 53 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Anthropic is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Anthropic is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Anthropic is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Eli-Lilly is slightly ahead of Anthropic. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Anthropic is clearly ahead of Eli-Lilly.

Anthropic carries 584,015 GitHub stars across 92 public repos, with 46 repositories active in the last 90 days and 911 external contributors on record. Eli-Lilly shows 0 stars across 0 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors.

Anthropic is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. Eli-Lilly looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.