Anthropic vs Ultimate.

Anthropic and Ultimate. both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Anthropic (rank #35) holds a meaningful lead over Ultimate. (rank #938) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (64 vs 24). The gap of 40 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Anthropic is ahead of Ultimate.. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Anthropic is clearly ahead of Ultimate.. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Anthropic is clearly ahead of Ultimate.. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Anthropic is clearly ahead of Ultimate.. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Anthropic is clearly ahead of Ultimate..

Anthropic carries 649,276 GitHub stars across 111 public repos, with 54 repositories active in the last 90 days and 581 external contributors on record. Ultimate. shows 4 stars across 22 public repos, 0 active in the last 90 days and 0 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Anthropic's footprint is roughly 162319.0x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Anthropic is the stronger read for anyone weighting community. Ultimate. makes more sense for teams already using its adjacent tools. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.