apaleo vs jotform
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
apaleo and jotform (Free Online Form Builder & Form Creator) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
apaleo (rank #459) holds a modest lead over jotform (rank #727) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (39 vs 30). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), jotform is slightly ahead of apaleo. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), apaleo is clearly ahead of jotform. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), jotform is ahead of apaleo. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), jotform is ahead of apaleo. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), jotform is ahead of apaleo.
apaleo carries 8 GitHub stars across 5 public repos, with 2 repositories active in the last 90 days and 1 external contributors on record. jotform shows 1,105 stars across 32 public repos, 4 active in the last 90 days and 3 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but jotform's footprint is roughly 138.1x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.
apaleo is the stronger read for anyone weighting education. jotform looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | apaleo | jotform |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #459 | #727 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 39 | 30 |
| Code | 40 | 43 |
| Education | 85 | 43 |
| Community | 11 | 20 |
| Reach | 23 | 41 |
| Momentum | 24 | 36 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 8 | 1,105 |
| Forks | 4 | 412 |
| Public repos | 5 | 32 |
| Active repos (90d) | 2 | 4 |
| External contributors | 1 | 3 |
| Avg polish | 39 | 46 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 32 | 29 |