Apollo's github repo. Be awed
Apollo.io vs Formspark
Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.
Apollo.io (Apollo's github repo. Be awed) and Formspark both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.
Formspark (rank #372) holds a narrow lead over Apollo.io (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (42 vs 34). The gap of 8 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.
On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Formspark is clearly ahead of Apollo.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Apollo.io is slightly ahead of Formspark. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Formspark is ahead of Apollo.io. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Apollo.io is clearly ahead of Formspark. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Formspark is clearly ahead of Apollo.io.
Apollo.io carries 73 GitHub stars across 41 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Formspark shows 67 stars across 8 public repos, 8 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.
Apollo.io is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Formspark looks better where momentum is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.
Side-by-side metrics
| Metric | Apollo.io | Formspark |
|---|---|---|
| Ranking | ||
| Overall rank | #602 | #372 |
| Pillars | ||
| Overall | 34 | 42 |
| Code | 35 | 59 |
| Education | 74 | 68 |
| Community | 16 | 31 |
| Reach | 32 | 0 |
| Momentum | 18 | 48 |
| Builder experience | 0 | 0 |
| Signals | ||
| Stars | 73 | 67 |
| Forks | 46 | 93 |
| Public repos | 41 | 8 |
| Active repos (90d) | 7 | 8 |
| External contributors | 5 | 2 |
| Avg polish | 28 | 53 |
| Avg AI-readiness | 34 | 35 |