Developer ecosystem comparison
vs

Apollo.io vs Hotjar

Developer ecosystem comparison across GitHub activity, SDKs, documentation, community, reach and momentum.

Apollo.io (Apollo's github repo. Be awed) and Hotjar (Product Experience Insights Tools) both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Hotjar (rank #317) holds a modest lead over Apollo.io (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (44 vs 34). The gap of 10 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Apollo.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Hotjar is ahead of Apollo.io. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Apollo.io. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Hotjar is clearly ahead of Apollo.io. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Hotjar is slightly ahead of Apollo.io.

Apollo.io carries 73 GitHub stars across 41 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Hotjar shows 52 stars across 2 public repos, 1 active in the last 90 days and 2 external contributors.

Apollo.io is worth a look for teams already invested in its stack. Hotjar looks better where reach is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.

Side-by-side metrics

MetricApollo.ioHotjar
Ranking
Overall rank#602#317
Pillars
Overall3444
Code3556
Education7488
Community1622
Reach3262
Momentum1824
Builder experience00
Signals
Stars7352
Forks4610
Public repos412
Active repos (90d)71
External contributors52
Avg polish2845
Avg AI-readiness3460

Fork ecosystems

Loading fork ecosystem…
Loading fork ecosystem…
View Apollo.io developer profileView Hotjar developer profile