Apollo.io vs Qonto

Apollo.io (Apollo's github repo. Be awed) and Qonto both appear on the Smoower Developer Ecosystem Index.

Qonto (rank #338) holds a modest lead over Apollo.io (rank #602) on the overall Smoower ecosystem score (43 vs 34). The gap of 9 points reflects composite signals across code, docs, community and reach.

On code quality (the state of repositories, tests, releases and polish), Qonto is clearly ahead of Apollo.io. On education (docs, guides and learning material for developers), Qonto is slightly ahead of Apollo.io. On community (issue response, PR reviews and discussion health), Qonto is ahead of Apollo.io. On reach (how visible the ecosystem is beyond its own repos), Apollo.io is slightly ahead of Qonto. On momentum (release cadence and how fast the ecosystem moves), Qonto is slightly ahead of Apollo.io.

Apollo.io carries 73 GitHub stars across 41 public repos, with 7 repositories active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors on record. Qonto shows 501 stars across 75 public repos, 11 active in the last 90 days and 5 external contributors. The star gap on its own does not decide the comparison, but Qonto's footprint is roughly 6.9x larger, which usually shows up in downstream signals like inbound issues and third party integrations.

Apollo.io is the stronger read for anyone weighting reach. Qonto looks better where code quality is the deciding factor. The table below breaks the scores down pillar by pillar; the linked profiles cover the underlying repos, docs and community signals in full.